Challenge to Beef Checkoff Denied

Clip Season 47 Episode 4746
The R-CALF challenge to the constitutionality of the Beef Checkoff was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court this week.

One of the Supreme Court’s final decisions of the term cuts the ability of the EPA to regulate power plants emissions. The ruling may be an indicator that the court is poised to block President Biden’s work to mitigate climate change.

Among the other rulings was a challenge to stop government checkoff programs.

Peter Tubbs has our report.   

Transcript

This week, the United States Supreme Court rejected a challenge from Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America, or R-CALF, over the implementation of the Beef Checkoff program. 

In 2016, R-CALF alleged the Beef Checkoff required cattle producers to subsidize the private speech of private entities, namely marketing arms of state beef boards.

R-CALF won an initial injunction in 2017, after which the USDA entered a memorandum of understanding with the beef councils in  20 states to centralize the marketing messages for the Beef Checkoff. 

The 9th Circuit Court ruled in 2021 that the reorganization by the USDA satisfied R-CALF’s request  that Beef Checkoff dollars not fund private speech. The Supreme Court concurred by not hearing the challenge.

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association noted the end of the lawsuit.

NCBA gfx: “The Supreme Court’s rejection of R-CALF’s petition confirms the Beef Checkoff, and its overseers, are adhering to the letter and spirit of the laws that protect and guide producer investments in the program,” - NCBA CEO Colin Woodall.”

R-CALF is pledging to seek further changes to the operation of the Beef Checkoff.

Bill Bullard, CEO, R-CALF: “Well, we continue to work in Congress on legislation that would achieve the reforms we seek in the legislative and the checkoff program, including making the checkoff a purely voluntary program as opposed to a mandatory program which makes it just a huge subsidy program in the cattle industry. And it's a subsidy program that we believe benefits the multi-national corporations at the expense of America's independent cattle producers.

For Market to Market, I’m Peter Tubbs

 

Read the Full Transcript

Watch More

    EpisodeSeason51Episode5137
    The Farm Bill clears the House with an unknown future. The Supreme Court takes up the issue of cancer warnings for RoundUp. Extremes in weather from tornadoes to rain to wildfires hit across the country. And, commodity market analysis with Arlan Suderman.
    ClipSeason51Episode5137
    Cotton, Hormuz Straight, inflation, energies, the Mexican border closure, drought and the Fed's balance sheet are all topics covered in our Market Plus.
    ClipSeason51Episode5137
    Arlan Suderman breaks down the impact of global weather on the wheat, corn and soybean markets in addition to inflation already showing up in commodities in our Market Analysis
    ClipSeason51Episode5137
    After three years of delays, the U.S. House passed a new version of the Farm Bill. The bill now goes to the U.S. Senate.
    ClipSeason51Episode5137
    A week of fires, floods and severe weather covered much of the country.
    ClipSeason51Episode5137
    Attorneys gave oral arguments were given in front of the U.S. Supreme Court this week over whether or not labels on the controversial herbicide Roundup needed to be specific about being a potential cancer risk.